Wheeled Backpacks Protocol

of why there should be liberal

Liberalism is an ideology that says wrongly based on individualism. A liberal society is based on 2 assumptions: first, argues that what's best for each individual is to respect the rules of the game, the rule of law . I respect your individual rights because it is what more you respect me and you should be mine because it's what suits you best. This is false and easy to understand why: if I'm stronger than you, what suits me is submit yourself and make you work for me and steal or destroy everything you have. If instead you're stronger than me, the same applies in reverse. In the case we have similar force, what we need is to look for some other motherfucker that is sufficiently weak and that we submit.

That is what is best so far. The situation changes when there are no sons of bitches that we submit, because either (a) have been destroyed or (b) are under the control of the strong.

Right now, liberals say, what should also abandon the struggle as a battle between strong cause too much loss. Then do not agree. Another fallacy. obviously not appropriate from the economic point of view: no one argues for example, that the First and Second World War were beneficial to European economies. Yet occurred, why? In the case of the former, because what we needed was armed. Neither France nor Germany eager for war, however, the French and the Germans were armed and the Germans saw as the French were armed. What is desirable then what? Arm. Later, when one of the actors (Germany) ruled that it had a comparative advantage against your enemy, it was agreed to attack and thus get rid of an enemy. In the case of the second, the war occurred because the Germans tried to attack was the most convenient. In this case, the reason for the war was not more security destroying an enemy but the lust for power.

The liberal argument can convince the second case but not the first: get safety is always paramount. These arguments can be applied in relations between countries through all forms of human organization or group to the individual.

Because we should not accept the rule of law , place left to the liberal, is the moral: respect for individual rights is necessary because what is right. That is, the liberal claims that individuals accept their version what is right and wrong. This is communism, not individualism. We see then how are you two doctrines of Enlightenment roots and shake hands as liberalism in the background is communism.